23rd August, 1939 was a dark day for Europe. On that day, the Reich Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop and Molotov, the Soviet People’s Commissar of Foreign Affairs, signed the heinous Hitler-Stalin Pact. The secret additional protocol to the Pact defined Soviet and German spheres of influence in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, as well as in Poland and the region then known as Bessarabia. It paved the way for the policy of injustice and inhumanity which brought disaster of a catastrophic scale on Europe, Ministry of Foreign Affairs writes.
Our united Europe has learned the historical lessons and has overcome the cynical and pernicious spirit of the Pact. Today, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians and Germans are part of the European community of shared culture rooted in our belief in peaceful interaction among equal partners in Europe of open borders. Its fundamental values are those which drove the European revolution for liberty in 1989: freedom of the individual, protection of human rights, democracy and rule of law as well as free market economy.
The basis of our community is trust among European neighbours and trust in Europe, our joint project. This harks back to the open-minded cooperation which had been linking our ancestors for centuries way back in the heyday of the Hanseatic League. It is firmly based on the strength of shared values, not on the questionable law of the strongest.
That said, this cooperation in Europe is not something we can take for granted, as the debt crisis reminds us. It has become a profound crisis of credibility and trust. The imbalances that have come about are not limited to those among the national economies of the eurozone. There is also a growing gap among national attitudes on the future of Europe. Two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall, a new split threatens to divide our continent, this time between north and south.
We cannot allow this to happen. Without united Europe, there’s no bright future for our countries. Germany is no more capable of managing global challenges on its own than Estonia, Latvia or Lithuania. Therefore, what we need now is further integration upholding European values. What we need is “more Europe”!
We stand united in our determination to overcome the crisis with the European policy of consolidation, growth and solidarity. We know from our own experience during the last few years how difficult the road ahead will be. However, we have also seen that even severe crises can be mastered with resolute reforms.
The successful reforms carried out in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should encourage us in Europe to continue along the path upon which we embarked when we signed the European Fiscal Compact and created the ESM rescue fund. They inspire us to continue championing “better spending” in negotiating new multiannual EU budget. We believe in the idea of “smart growth”: targeted investments in innovation are the most appropriate way to regain economic competitiveness in Europe.
Apart from intelligent crisis management, we also need to conduct a joint European debate on Europe’s future. Not least, this will make it easier for us to overcome the challenges that lie ahead. There are three crucial points here:
Firstly, we need to make the monetary union fit for the future by complementing it with closer collaboration in economic and fiscal policy. This is just as important to Germany and Estonia which are members of the eurozone as to its prospective members Latvia and Lithuania.
We want to continue demonstrating our solidarity with those member states which have been hit particularly hard by the crisis. Here we will have to uphold the democratic principle that greater responsibility can only be assumed in exchange for greater control.
Secondly, we need to ensure that Europe continues to enjoy effective and democratically accountable institutions. Deeper European integration will be possible only if citizens and states see that their interests are represented with vigour on the European level and full democratic oversight is ensured.
Thirdly, we need to make Europe a truly global player. If this potential is to be fulfilled, we need to develop a comprehensive approach to the European external policy, fully in line with our internal values such as peaceful interaction, democracy and solidarity. We are determined to work together to overcome the crisis which the European project is currently facing. In doing so, we can build on the trust which links Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians and Germans in our united Europe. 23rd August, 1939, a dark day in history, reminds us how precious our European culture of trust is.
Audronius Ažubalis is Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Lithuania, Urmas Paet is Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Estonia, Edgars Rinkēvičs is Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Latvia and Guido Westerwelle is Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Obviously the Germans are not just a little more capable of managing global challenges, they are so much more capable it can’t be compared. Probably all they meant by this statement is that the world is smaller nowadays and their will probably be these “alliances” for a long while. My opinion is that if its unelected, its no good, I don’t care if its Josef Stalin or the Queen of Britain, we ought to have the right to make that choice at least.
Wow that’s a great quote in the article, ” Germany is no more capable of managing global challenges on its own than Estonia, Latvia, or Lithuania”. Ofcourse I have to defend one of the best presidents ever, of any country, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, obviously things changed after the election, like people being murdered, and bombings of Pearl harbor, now if he did not send our boys abroad after that, he’d deserve to be impeached and over ruled, we can agree with that. Also people don’t seem to remember this fact but the soviets were not enemies (of the U.S. or the allies) at the time although a lot did guess correctly that they would be the next “problem” after the war, and thankfully they were on “the good side” (during the war) or it would be a very different story. And as for “giving” the Balts and eastern europe to the soviets, America and the allies (FDR was dead before the end of the war) weren’t going to start WWIII right after the biggest war in history (could you blame them) especially while America is still in Japan- waiting for Russia’s deadline to see if they would help- also if you have these choices what would you choose, give eastern europe to the pieces of spit you’re fighting (Nazis) and risk war with the Russians anyway, “let” the soviets stay and end the war, or start WWIII right after the worst war in history and try to push the Russians back out of eastern europe, key words eastern europe. Michael I have seen you write this a number of times and unfortunately its true, everybody knows how western europeans and even a lot of people in North America look at the eastern europeans, maybe if there was more money in eastern europe those bad views would change.
It can be a matter of speculation as to why the infamous Yalta Agreement, signed three months before the war’s end, is leapfrogged to lament a by then irrelevant Pact signed nearly six years previously. It was the terms of the Yalta Agreement, signed by unelected Josef Stalin, unelected Winston Churchill and elected on a lie ‘we will not send your boys abroad,’ U.S. President Roosevelt that agreed to the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe, including the Baltic States.
I have a copy of the rare Suicide of Europe, the memoirs of Prince Michael Sturdza. He was then the Romanian Foreign Minister. It might explain why Germany, at the time undefeated and a legitimate candidate to discuss peace terms and the aftermath, was excluded. This might give you a clue:
I quote: ‘It was Hitler’s belief that Britain and the United States would recognise the threat posed to Europe by Communism, and he was keen to sign a separate peace treaty with the West and return Eastern Europe to self governing states.
‘In February 1945 the German leader sent a message to his emissary, Mihailovich, the Chetnik leader, to convey to the British his preparedness to hold on to all eastern territories, whatever the German losses, provided that the United States and Britain would fill the vacuum, with the full co-operation of the German armed forces. Britain and America refused, telling Mihailovich to make the offer to Russia instead.’
Perhaps it is because the victors’ write history that this is glossed over? It was the notorious Yalta Agreement, not the Molotov – Ribbentrop Pact that consigned much of our continent to chains. I don’t see the point in letting these three rogues off the hook, especially 68-years since they signed it.